Social program line surmisal suggests that offensive , its deterrence and preponderance , is a product of the process of social learning and interactions . thusly , incarnate crime is a consequence of the working conditions and purlieu of employees (Simpson , 2002 . Employees are motivated from committing crime to stay as conk out of their orientation into the organization or to protect one s line of descent , advancement and social standing in the company . Controls of corporate crime can then be developed at once , by establishment of punitive measures such as demotion , prisonbreak or dismissal indirectly by offering incentives for life history advancement for those who comply with regulations internally by emphasizing the communal effect of failure to comply with regulations and through needs joy methods or providing benefits such as retirement or commitment programsEnvironmental criminology suggests a link amidst the incidence of crime and spatial settings . This means that there are certain environments that become predispose to crime or to a particular crime or that an individual s cognitive deportments are influenced by this environment . These spatial areas are characterized by not only living conditions still also by a lifestyle that creates greater pic to victimization (Bartol Bartol , 2006 . These areas develop because of the vulnerability of victims , lack of mechanisms for monitoring or detection and the possibility of significant rewards from crimeAmong the sociological theories regarding criminal behavior , learning theory can provided significant insights to the current trends in homicides and assaults in the United States . In contrast to control theory , there is indication that punitive measures and conditioning is not influencing these crime trends as indicated by the establishemtn of no clear relationship between the severity of control mechanisms and the prevalence of homicides and assault (Weisner et al , 2003 .
though this is not to day that control theories can not be productive in the study of criminal behavior , by using learning theories , the nature of these crimes can be examine to determine what causes the characteristics or behaviors associated with aggression (Jensen , 2007 . Furthermore , by perusal the social learning process that leads to these crimes , factors that influence the level of control that individuals can develop can used to determine interference programsReferencesBartol , Curt R Anne M . Bartol (2006 . Current Perspectives in rhetorical Psychology And Criminal Justice . London : Sage PublicationsJensen , Gary F (2007 . Social Learning and bowelless Behavior . The Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior . David Flannery , Alexander Vazonsyi , and Irwin Waldman (Editors . Cambridge : Cambridge University PressSimpson , Sally S (2002 . Corporate execration . Law , and Social Control Cambridge : Cambridge University PressWeisner , M , Capaldi , D . M Paterson , G ( 2003 . Development of ant-social behavior and crime across the life-span from a social interactionist perspective : The coercion model . In R . L . Akers G . F Jensen (Eds . Social Learning and the report of Crime : New Directions for a New Century . pp . 317-337Title page 2...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment