Media Ownership

Miller cites this and also the cost-cutting big companies were generating as evidence how the news divisions could no longer be trusted to pursue the stories the public requirements to see and hear.

Miller things on the variety of mergers taking location and cites the situation of Time Warner, which was rapidly becoming the largest with the group. At the time as soon as Miller wrote this article, Time Warner was within the procedure of taking more than Ted Turner's organizations and such as these in its huge stable of companies. This deal has subsequently been completed, and it has already made a issue that has caused several during the media to reconsider the effects of these mergers on a public. In New York City, the cable provider is really a division of Time Warner. The cable has lengthy carried CNN, that is certainly a station operated by Ted Turner. Thus, Time Warner today owns CNN and supplies that station on its cable service. There are 2 other all-news services in operation today, a single made by NBC (MSNBC) and also the other produced by Rupert Murdoch's company, the new Fox News Network. Time Warner were told already that it had to give a slot on the cable to a rival news service, and it specific the NBC station, ostensibly a decision produced by Ted Turner, extended a rival of Rupert Murdoch. The men and women of New York who may well need to see Murdoch's station can't as a result of this decision. The entire trouble became additional tough to characterize after political leaders.

 

n the city entered the fray on Murdoch's side since he was a contributor to their campaigns. Mayor Rudy Giuliani advised that 1 with the city's channels could possibly be used for Murdoch's station, which would be illegal.

This issues to the real dilemma of the changes that Miller foresees. A close observation on the 3 television networks shows that the viewer will not yet see a lot evidence of corporate interference or a reduction in news-gathering as a result of these mergers. As on the folks of New York City, the actual difficulty is that the viewer usually do not see much adjust and don't know what he or she just isn't seeing. If a news company decides not to cover a story, the viewer might be none the wiser. The decision by CBS not to run the original Brown & Williamson story was leaked to other news media and so became an issue, but if that leak had not occurred, the viewer would not know he or she was becoming deprived. The story would just not be told, and an crucial issue would thus not be aired. At any given time, there are thousands of important stories being covered, and options are created every day. After we watch news broadcasts, we expect that the news-gatherers are looking out for our interests and are developing the most critical data at any given time. As Miller rightly items out, we may well no longer be able to have such trust in our news organizations, and yet we might never be certain if this really is so. We only know we are being deprived after someone involved speaks to another news source and lets us know it, as happened with the CBS case.

Such decisions could be noticed as innocent and needed given the reality that cable systems have a limited number of channels so that some alternatives need to be made. After all, the New York franchise does have a couple of all-news channels and so does have competition as required by law. The truth that Murdoch has lost out will harm his new channel, but MSNBC would be harmed if the choice were otherwise.

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!