Accounting Standards in the United States of America

story in the the States The future(a)(a) enshroud proffer describe and talk over the major(ip) elements of account in the ground forces. It ordain show that the US Generally original accounting Principles (generally accepted method of bill principles) be aim by the mo exonerateary Accounting Standards Board (FASB), where as the internationalistic Accounting Standards (IAS) atomic number 18 placed by the transnational financial account Standards (IFRS). This report bequeath as well as extract the inter alteration equal to(p)ities and differences betwixt these standards. In addition, the make outing report give intake relevant examples to esteem current account problems and issues in the the States related to planetary convergence of accounting standards.Fargher et al. (2008, page. 67) pointed out that FASBs conceptual good example (CFW) for fiscal describe is generally concordant with that of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). so far the FASB provides much detail with six statements of fiscal accounting concepts (SFACs). The first level in the CFW explains the main purposes of financial reports ar to provide useful information for investors and creditors, to estimate future bullion descends and to claim venture resources. The encourage level consists of qualitative characteristics and elements of the CFW.The qualitative characteristics of the the States CFW argon relevance, reliability, comparability and consistency. The main components allow assets, liabilities, equity, investment funds by owners, distri stillions to owners, general income, tax incomeations, expenses, gains and losses. The third gear level of CFW indicates how the firm executes the events based on assumptions, principles and constraints. There are four assumptions economical equity, going concern, monetary unit and periodicity. The four principles include historic cost, revenue enhancement recognition, matching and full di sclosure.The constraints consist of cost- put on, materiality, industry hold and conservatism. Fargher (2008, p. 229) mentioned that the States uses FASB 95 Statement of silver Flows, increase FASB 102 and 104. The format is the same as the outside(a) one which includes operating, investing and financial activities. However, it is encouraged to report cash flows apply the direct method even though the indirect method is unremarkably used. refer paid and received and dividends received are classified as operating activities. Non cash transactions are excluded from the cash flow statement. Fargher (2008, p. 89) stated that the income statement format chthonic US generally accepted accounting principles involves a pass of steps except the subtotals are listed onwards the unusual and rare items. Changes in hold earnings are included in the retained earnings statement and comprehensive income that reports changes in fair value and similar items after the operating income. Not e disclosure is based on particular standards plus SEC and other sources down the stairs the US GAAP hierarchy. IFRS and US GAAP fill some similarities but in that location are also several differences. The main similarities and differences are in the field of studys of revenue recognition and enumeration evaluation.A similarity among US GAAP and IFRS is that revenue is non recognised until the revenue is actually earned. Under the US GAAP, a large amount of focussing provided usually only applies to specific industries. For example, there are specific rules for the recognition of software revenue and sales of real estate downstairs US GAAP, while comparable guidance does not exist down the stairs IFRS (Ernst &038 unexampled 2010). Also, both systems define catalogue as assets held for sale in the ordinary chassis of chore. A significant difference between using US GAAP and IFRS is the inventory costing method is that US uses snuff it in first out, whereas LIFO is pr ohibited by the IFRS.Also, inventory valuation is measured under the IFRS at lour of cost and net realizable value. However, under the US GAAP, inventory valuation is carried at the lower of cost and market, where the market is the current replacement cost (Ernst &038 Young 2010). concord to (Todd M. Hines 2007, p1) IFRSs are becoming more grave in the world(a) economy. Over the last 35 years there has been a strong push towards the adoption of a uniform set of financial accounting standards to replace the myriad number of pastoral-specific standards at a time in use. This indicates that each country has developed its own sets of financial accounting standards.It is essential to work towards the uniformed international accounting standards for organisations doing business globally to fool comparable information. As a issuing of this push for internationally recognised set of accounting standards, IFRS were created with the goal of providing a maven internationally recognized set of accounting standards. In an ever increasingly globally connected world, more transactions and investment planning occur on a global level. As international convergence has progressed many countries engage conformed under IFRS and pick out their standards.The ground forces has similar standards but tarry to use different financial describe standards. However these differences according to (Todd M. Hines 2007, p4) a lot direct to confusion and large complications for preparers and users of financial statements. Financial statements prepared under different inform standards are hardly comparable, therefore foreign investors may not be able to compare between the financial reports of business under IFRS and those operating under US GAAP. This can lead to confusion and come upon the judgments of financial statement users.Due to the difficulties in compare the users of the financial information must study both IFRS and GAAP to make inform decisions. Moving from US GA AP to IFRS volition pay off a major wedge on business financial describe in the USA. Decisions made by managers, financial advisors, CEOs, governments, and the users of financial statements volition seduce to be drastically rethought with the change. If the USA decides to follow the convergence trend towards IFRS, they will be moving into a more vapourisable reporting environment, particularly in the reporting of assets as well as that of net profit.One alarming statistic is that the volatility of tax benefits, deferred tax benefits in particular, can be 98% more volatile under IFRS (McAnally, et. al. 2010). This increase volatility is due to the greater use of fair value in the education of the financial statements, and the eventual elimination of historical cost under IFRS. Fair value are used under IFRS to break reflect the changing economic conditions, but this introduces uncertainty and makes it much harder to predict account earnings than under historical cost, which the USA uses.Although fair value is more relevant, often it is not reliable due to the work out of economic conditions on the valuation of assets. This increase volatility will lead to prepare in every area of accounting. With the change to IFRS, there will be a large amount of rethinking and educate for areas much(prenominal) as financial planning and prediction as well as in target setting, but the major area it will affect is the reporting of financial statements. Another issue regarding the convergence of the USA to the IFRS accounting standards is the effect it will have on IT systems.As the adoption of IFRS starts to gain whim among many counties, global business will be dealing with major changes over the next few years. According to Pratt (2010), not only are private companies considering the IFRS, but also public companies including banks and private investors who also have growing concerns about the importee of the convergence. This adoption of IFRS by the USA will bring about several changes in the way recording and reporting financial entropy is carried out. This is due to the differences between IFRS and U. S.GAAP standards. It has been undercoat that there are 103 differences between IFRS and U. S. GAAP in the way recording of data happens. caution in the performance and engineering division of KPMG suggests that the change to IFRS will drastically affect the accounting IT systems in the USA (Pratt, 2010). One of the major concerns for the USA is that under IFRS the financial data needed to find IT systems up to date will have to be more detailed and more frequent. It is also believed that the financial reporting playscript will be affected by adopting IFRS.Pratt (2010) claimed the US needs to make sure that the sensitive system accommodates IFRS if companies are planning to kick upstairs the system. This will mean more gold will need to be entertained from other key functions and into the development and upgrading of IT systems. With the major push for convergence, the USA needs to critically evaluate the effect that their move to IFRS may have on their IT systems and the software they use. Also, U. S. companies will need to become familiar with the new-fashioned systems and technology before the change in order to keep up with international competitors.The major elements of the USA include the conceptual framework, financial reports, revenue recognition and inventory. winning problems and issues into account, our group concludes that the convergence of the USA to IFRS would benefit both, the global economy and the USA. Although problems with financial reporting, volatility, retraining and IT systems may arise, converging to international standards will allow users to have easy comparisons between companies and greater transparency.In conclusion, we feel it is beneficial for the USA to converge to international standards so that there are a set of global standards for all companies to follow. Word Count 1491 BIBLIOGAPHY Books Fargher, N, Wise, V, Kieso, DE, Weygand, JJ &038Warfield, TJ 2008, rudiments of Intermediate accounting, John Wiley &038 Sons Australia, Milton. Websites Ernst &038 Young, 2010, Revenue Recognition, viewed 29 September 2011, Ernst &038 Young, 2010, Inventory, viewed 29 September 2011, L. Gordon Crovitz. 2008 (September 8). apogee the Information GAAP, viewed 29 September 2011. lt http//online. wsj. com/ article/SB122083366235408621. html> Mary E. Barth. 2004. Fair set and Financial Statement Volatility, viewed 29 September. daybook Articles Todd M. Hines 2007 International Financial Reporting Standards A Guide to Sources for International Accounting Standards diary of Business &038 Finance Librarianship, Vol. 12(3), p. 1-8 McAnally, M, McGuire, S, &038 Weaver, C 2010, Assessing the Financial Reporting Consequences of Conversion to IFRS The Case of Equity-Based Compensation, Accounting Horizons, Vol 24 (4), p. 589-621Gornik-Tomaszewski, S 2003, Short-Ter m intersection point Between US GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards, Bank Accounting &038 Finance (08943958), Vol 16 (5), p. 39-42 Tarca, A 2004, International Convergence of Accounting Practices Choosing between IAS and US GAAP, Journal of International Financial Management &038 Accounting, Vol 15 (1), pp. 60-91 Pratt, MK 2010, GET READY FOR globose ACCOUNTING, Computerworld, Vol 44 (3), p. 21-23 Laux, C. &038 Leuz, C 2009. The crisis of fair-value accounting qualification sense of the recent debate. Accounting, Organizations and Society. V 34 (6-7), p. 826-834