Was Socrates guilty or not?

Plato wrote about trail of Socrates in ancient Athens. Writer heading story in a way where we dont get to happen upon accusers, we are only able to hear an explanation of a person who was called to the court. In the end of the story Socrates is found fineable to be punished but does that judgment reflect accredited guiltiness?

When we considering whether someones is guilty or innocent, first we have

to look walking(prenominal) at the system of justice, rules that it follows and charges carried out. Every court follow accepted rules and has its own unique point of view. One can supply a judgment of guiltiness and other opposite in the same case. Court which judged Socrates follows by the rules that were set up by Athenians and reflect the standards and norms of Athens at that time. So even though we didnt get to hear accusers, reader can conclude that their rescue applied better to well known standards, required in court in opposite to the speech of Socrates which didnt o commute judges. Accused claims Ive been convinced because I was at loss, not still for speeches, but for daring and shamelessness and willingness to say the sorts of things to you that you would have been most pleased to hear :me wailing and lamenting .. (38d).



This means Socrates was conscious, that hes judged by rules that might not uncover the truth behind charges, and adjacent and agreeing to those rules is impossible for him because he would deny to a person he was all his life.

So what is Socrates accused of? He challenges with charges that have been risen umteen years before the trial and sound like that: Socrates does disadvantage and is meddlesome, by investigating the things under the earth and the heavenly things,

If you demand to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper