Shakespeares King Henry IV Part I centres on a nerve theme of the troth between order and disorder. Such conflict is brought to light by the use of many vehicles, including Hals inner conflict, the countrys political and social conflict, the conflict between the appeal world and the tavern world, and the conflicting moral value of characters from each of these worlds. This juxtaposition of trustworthy values exists on many levels, and so is both a strikingly present and an underlying theme throughout the play. by means of characterization Shakespeare explores moral conflict, and passage three is a prime example of Falstaffs enduring moral disorder. By this stage in the play Hal has reformed, moved away from his former mentor Falstaff and travel a good and honourable prince.
Hals remark to his father indicates a now strong, independent mind, predicting that Douglas and Hotspur will not accept Henrys provide because of their love for fighting. Henrys reply in turn indicates a veer in attitude towards his son, a newfound respect. Acknowledging Hals prediction, the king orders preparations to begin, and we invite he has his own set of solid moral values: knowing that their cause is just helps him to reconcile with his highly honourable conscience that at that place is indeed cause for war.
Still maintained is the conflict between the very format of the text, with Hal and Henrys conversation held in formal versify typical of the court world, in which Hal is now firmly embedded. Falstaff, however, sustains his equally typical prose speech, which indicates to the audience the enduring division between the court and tavern worlds.
As soon as the king leaves, Falstaff immediately proclaims his brazen cowardice, asking Hal to protect him in battle. The prince retorts with an insult to Falstaffs enormous size, and dead bids him farewell.
If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment