.

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Crime and punishment--is rasko

In Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov concocts a theory: All men ar divided into ‘ ordinary’ and ‘ rare’. The extraordinary adult male should fetch the good to eliminate a few pot in order to make his idea kn consume to totally bounty; merely, the ordinary humanity has no right to transgress the law. Because he believes this theory is an idea that must be known to all humanity, he con expressionrs himself extraordinary; however, there is a legion of events that judge that Raskolnikov is non extraordinary.          One can be sure that Raskolnikov believes himself to be extraordinary when Porfiry says, “...surely you couldn’t scram helped...fancying yourself...an ‘extraordinary’ man, uttering a new-sprung(prenominal) give voice in your sense.... That’s so, isn’t it?” to which Raskolnikov replies, “Quite peradventure” (247).

Raskolnikov was strongly prompted to murder Alyona when he recalled a conversation that took plaza between two ordinary men in a bar. One declared: I could k disadvantageously that damned one-time(a) woman and make off with her money without the faintest conscious-prick.... For one life, thousands would be saved from corruption and decay.... Besides, what value has the life of that sickly, stupid, ill-natured darkened woman in the balance of existence? (63) Raskolnikov reasoned that it would be honorable to kill Alyona since it would supposedly benefit humanity, scarce the feature that “ordinary” men had the same idea should have today put a stop to all thoughts that he was extraordinary.

During Raskolnikov’s visit to the police station to retrieve his pledges, he and Porfiry be select engaged in conversation involving the theory. Porfiry voiced concerns about ordinary batch mistaking themselves as extra-ordinary. Raskolnikov responded with, “...[Ordinary state] cogency have a thrashing some clock for letting their fancy run extraneous with them and to teach them their place... (244)”. Raskolnikov endured a ‘thrashing’ of sorts (his illness), but he had been passing through that since before the murders. “And his drowsiness and stupefaction were followed by an extraordinary, febrile as it were distracted haste. But the preparations to be made were few” (64).

Porfiry also voiced his concern that “ordinary” people power mistake themselves as “extraordinary” and kill innocent people when they have no inner right to do so. Raskolnikov concurs with him when he says, “The vain and foolish are particularly apt to overhaul into that snare; young people especially” (246). The first objurgate of the novel points out Raskolnikov’s age: “...early in July a young man [(Raskolnikov)] came out of the garret...” (1). Unknowingly Raskolnikov put himself into his own category of ignorant, vulnerable people.

Though according to Raskolnikov, an “extraordinary man” has the right to transgress the law, he never implies that the extraordinary man’s conscience won’t torment him. In fact he states, “Pain and suffering are unendingly inevitable for a large intelligence and a turbid heart.” Raskolnikov has been through a great amount of pain and suffering, however contrition for his crime is never mentioned. This point of his theory does non apply to him.

Raskolnikov’s theory says, “The extraordinary man has the right to commit any crime and...overstep any obstacle that stands in the way of the practical fulfillment of his idea.

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!

” Raskolnikov obviously considered Alyona as an obstacle, but how was Alyona preventing the practical fulfillment of any idea? His “new word” (the part of his theory that asserted that the killing of innocent people was sometimes acceptable) did not actually require the elimination of any person to make it known. It was after all, made known to people when it was published in a magazine, therefore, he didn’t have the right to kill Alyona in the first place.

Some might say that, in accordance with his theory, Raskolnikov suffered illness after his crime, thereby making him extraordinary. Though it’s true that he suffered, he never said perpetration of a crime by an extraordinary man is always accompanied by illness. Also, Raskolnikov was ill before he had committed the murders. This strongly suggests that his malady was not actually related to the crime at all.

After the legitimate introduction of his Extraordinary homophile theory (241), Raskolnikov contends that the “Extraordinary existence” must be self-reliant, depend on no one, and be cut off from society. Though there are times when he wants to escape humanity, time and again it is obvious that Raskolnikov inevitably companionship. In several instances, Raskolnikov visited Sonia. Raskolnikov’s longing for communion proves that he doesn’t fulfill his own requirements of extraordinariness.

Raskolnikov likes to think that he is an “extraordinary man”, but the reader sees quite another side of him. Through his contradictory ideas, life that was inconsistent with the “Extraordinary Man” theory, and social behavior, it becomes obvious that Raskolnikov is actually rather ordinary.

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment